By: Bella Dalba
On November 12, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH)
indicated that he would not support the Main Street Fairness Act (MSFA), a bill
that would allow state and local governments to collect sales tax on internet
sales. Under the terms of the Act, Congress would authorize the Streamlined
Sales and Use Tax Agreement – a multistate agreement which was adopted on
November 12, 2002, by twenty-four states – and impose it on the remaining
twenty-six.
The general idea of the MSFA is to simplify
the administration of sales and use taxes, as there is no clear formula for
determining how it should vary from state to state. This lends itself to the
argument for the MSFA, as it has long been “leveling the playing field.”
Physically present brick-and-mortar stores are required by most states to
charge sales tax, while internet-based retailers often escape sales tax in
states where they have no presence. The MSFA disregards that status altogether,
allowing state and local governments to collect sales taxes on internet sales
made inside state borders, even if the point of origin is outside their
jurisdiction. Kelly Phillips Erb, a Forbes contributor, provides an example:
“If I bought something from GenericStore-dot-com and GenericStore-dot-com
didn’t have a warehouse or other presence in my state, under the MSFA, my state
could still collect sales tax. Currently, that’s not the case: without a
presence, like a warehouse, there’s no sales tax payable (however, use tax may
still be collectible, depending on the state).
The measure has been divisive since its
inception. Last year, the Senate passed the MSFA with the majority of
affirmative votes originating from Democrats, who controlled the Senate. Not
surprisingly, the bill did not pass the Republican-controlled House. Key among
the opposition at that time? Speaker Boehner.
Rep. Boehner’s spokesperson commented on the bill; “The
Speaker has made clear in the past that he has significant concerns about the
bill, and it won’t move forward this year.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
(D-NV) seems to have a different take: he’s hoping to push the bill ahead
before the end of the year. Due to the results of the 2015 mid-term election,
Sen. Reid loses his position as Senate Majority Leader, which could result in a
compromise vote, though this is to be expected: the remaining lame-duck session
of Congress, Democrats in the Senate will be aggressive in the institution and
adaption of multiple bills. This also means the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA)
is up for renewal: a very popular law that imposes a moratorium (a temporary
prohibition of an activity) on taxing internet access.
Be sure to note the distinction between ITFA and MSFA: a tax
on internet access is not the same thing as a tax on internet sales. Currently,
taxing internet access is barred by a law that was first instituted in 1997;
however, it’s important to note that this is not a permanent law, but a
moratorium. In order to keep the moratorium active, Congress must vote to
extend it, which has been done four times: in 2001, 2004, 2007, and in November
of this year. The ITFA was scheduled to end earlier this month – just before
the midterm elections – and was not-so-coincidentally extended until after the
election had taken place.
Speaker Boehner supports extending the moratorium beyond
2014, as do most Americans. The House passed a bill this summer that would have
permanently extended the moratorium, but the Senate, expressing concerns about
the permanence, did not. Thus, there is suggested potential solution that the
ITFA could be tacked onto the MSFA in order to get it through both Houses of
Congress.
The opportunity for a compromise does provide hope to the
supporters of MSFA, which include the National Retail Federation, the Retail
Industry Leaders Association, and, surprisingly, Amazon (previously, the
conglomerate was vocal about opposing any form of internet tax). If a
compromise is going to happen, it will have to happen quickly: the moratorium
on taxing internet access ends on December 11, 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.