By: Peter Lewis
(Writer’s Note- This article will not
debate whether or not NASCAR, National Association for Stock Car Automobile
Racing, is a sport, rather, it will examine the problems it faces, how it got
to there, and its future.)
If
you haven’t heard, the NASCAR season came to an end with driver Jimmie Johnson
winning his sixth title in eight years.
It may be hard to remember, but at the turn of the millennium NASCAR was
one of the fastest growing “sports” in the America and becoming very popular
outside the South, where it originated.
As Forbes magazine reported from 1998 to 2005, NASCAR had substantially
higher television ratings than the NFL.
Since 2006, though, they’ve seen a decline, but since 2010, they’ve seen
a dramatic fall. Attendance has also
dropped dramatically since 2009, around twenty percent, reports YahooSports.
So
what happened to NASCAR, exactly?
Clearly, it wasn’t a fad. Since the 1980s interest in NASCAR was growing
and it reached unimaginable popularity in the late 1990s and early 2000s. So, most viewers were content with nothing
but left turns and southern venues and drivers every Sunday afternoon. For many, this era of NASCAR fans were
witness to drivers with different personalities, rivalries, close and dangerous
racing and death defying that became appealing entertainment. It also managed to feel like every week was
different and never really got to predictable, which caused attention and
popularity to sky rocket in the early 2000s.
NASCAR’S
problems probably did begin, however, when it got popular. NASCAR was primarily a Southern business, but
as the rest of the U.S. gained interest in the company, NASCAR decided to move
out of the South and expand to states it never dared going to, such as California,
Texas, and Arizona . This expanded its
presence around the country, but at a cost to its identity in some
regards. Yet, this wasn’t its biggest
problem; the fan base did grow and the Southern audience remained, but as time
moved on it became a much more glaring problem.
As its popularity fell in those states far from the South, the
attendance and viewership went down.
NASCAR’S
second problem was how it put money ahead of product. As NASCAR grew, so did the teams, but the
problem was money. Just putting a car on
a track for practice costs a team a lot of money, so sponsorship was needed
more than ever. With this, NASCAR
obviously got greedy and became too concerned with getting new sponsorships and
having networks broadcasting their events.
This stigma also fell on the teams and drivers, personalities became blander
as drivers went from daredevils to walking talking billboards, rivalries became
rarer, and those that occurred were shot down by NASCAR for safety
reasons. The racing became too
conservative and started becoming three and half hours of follow the leader,
compared to cars always passing and making daring moves, which kept fans on the
edge of their seats.
Yet,
none of this could compare to NASCAR’s final and ultimate failure, The Chase for
the Cup. The debate of NASCAR being a
sport had still been a topic of discussion even at its peak. NASCAR was convinced it was a sport, and, to
prove it, they invented their own playoff, The Chase. The Chase is a concept where 12 drivers
attempt to stay in the top 12 standings for the first 26 races of the
season. The top 12 are the only drivers
for the last ten races who can win the championship. This system is simply laughable; no other
racing company does this, not even NASCAR’S other series. For example during a cross country race,
everyone has a shot at winning. What if
suddenly they’re all stopped and the first ten runners are the only ones who
can win and then race the final miles starting at the same time, completely
disregarding the first place runner’s lead?
The other runners can still run, but can’t win. This is simply the most idiotic system ever
put in place, but in NASCAR’S mind they had a good reason. Their reason was that the old points system
made it too easy to win the championship, which meant the final three or four
races of the year had the lowest rating, even though this point system had
occurred throughout the years and its popularity continued growing with it.
NASCAR was still convinced it would not be beneficial to their future. Those occurrences of a driver running away
with the championship were fairly uncommon, however, and the ratings didn’t
take a dramatic fall as NASCAR had to believe.
What did make the ratings collapse was the Chase itself. Since its debut in 2004, when ratings were at
their peak and more than doubled the NFL’s ratings, the interest in NASCAR
declined rapidly when people became aware of its short comings and how it did
away with competition. While it
initially added some tension to the final races of the season, the problems
listed above and the Chase began NASCAR’S downfall. Racing became conservative and most were
racing to make the playoff group. When the
Chase began, it made it simply too easy to win.
After ten of these abominations to racing, Jimmie Johnson has won
six. Does this mean he’s one of the
greatest drivers ever like Petty and Earnhardt who won seven in the old
system? Well in the old system this is
what the season would have looked like if the Chase hadn’t existed from 2004 to
2012:
From
Bleacher Report:
2004:
Chase 2inner- Kurt Bush by 8
2004:
Old system winner- Jeff Gordon by 47
2005:
Chase winner- Tony Stewart by 35
2005:
Old system winner- Tony Stewart by 215
2006:
Chase winner- Jimmie Johnson by 56
2006:
Old system winner- Jimmie Johnson by 4
2007:
Chase winner- Jimmie Johnson by 77
2007:
Old system winner- Jeff Gordon by 353
2008:
Chase winner- Jimmie Johnson by 69
2008:
Old system winner- Carl Edwards by 16
2009:
Chase winner- Jimmie Johnson by 141
2009:
Old system winner- Jimmie Johnson by 66
2010:
Chase winner- Jimmie Johnson by 39
2010:
Old system winner- Kevin Harvick by 285
2011:
Chase winner- Tony Stewart by tie breaker over Carl Edwards
2011:
Old system winner- Carl Edwards by 7
2012:
Chase winner- Brad Keselowski by 39
2012:
Old system winner- Brad Keselowski by 19
Now,
yes, as Bleacher Report states, this doesn’t take into account that drivers
could have handled the final races differently and momentum could have changed
as well. However, from this it’s easy to
see the Chase is not the best system in any way.
Since
its introduction, the Chase has ruined NASCAR.
All the hard work since the 1950s to bring it to the mainstream was
ruined. Is it fair to say this? With the
evidence above, yes. When people found out the Chase was not efficient in
crowning a true championship (after Johnson won his fourth in a row after
2009), the ratings and attendance shot down fast. NASCAR has been oblivious to their problems
and their solutions to try to attract viewers and fans back have failed. ESPN and TNT opted out of their television
deals with NASCAR weeks ago, showing its glory days are long gone and the end
is truly coming. Can they do anything to
regain their lost glory? At this moment
it doesn’t look likely in any way, the damage has been done and the former fans
have found other sources of Sunday entertainment, NFL ratings increased
dramatically since the Chase was introduced.
The safe bet for race fans at this point, look into Indy Car or F1,
because NASCAR will most likely be gone within the next decade. It’s unfortunate, but they brought this upon
themselves by becoming greedy and not attempting to give fans the best product
possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.