By: Brad Tripp
It’s 11:45a.m and the bell rings. Students from what seems like nowhere appear,
their eyes wide, mouths watering, and all they want is food. They grab a cafeteria
tray and the food is now within inches of their fingers. The food is then paid
for and consumed. What did they just buy? How healthy was it? Is the American
lunch program good or bad? Here’s a look:
History:
In 1946, the 79th U.S Congress started to look more
closely at the things public schools needed, like equipment and food to feed
the students. According to the United States’ Department of Agriculture, this
is when President Harry Truman put into effect the National School Lunch Program.
The take off of this program was slow, but it was eventually authorized by Congress
and any equipment, food or space needed would be provided to feed the students (if
the school hadn’t the funds for it). In some cases, this is still in effect,
but requires pay back.
Nutrition:
How good is the food being served to the students today?
According to the Massachusetts Department of Secondary and Elementary Education,
“all food brought in for the school lunch program must meet all federal
requirements in order to be served in schools.” The most current dietary
guidelines for Americans instruct that the food served in schools includes no
more than 30% of our dietary fats be saturated and 10% unsaturated fats and no
more than 30% of your daily protein, vitamin C, vitamin A, protein, calcium and
calories.
Changes:
As time has moved on, what changes have we seen in the lunch
programs? These changes include better nutrition and meal size in school
lunches. However, many think the proportions aren’t big enough. Why is this? Michelle
Obama has worked to put in place guidelines for school lunches nationwide, which
will try to save money and still provide proper nutrition. Included with this,
schools were only to serve diet sodas. This is because it helps to limit fats
and sugar and, hopefully, aid in combatting childhood obesity. Some schools are just ignoring this program,
claiming that it is unworkable. According to newsmax.com, some schools are
beginning to lose money trying to meet the new guidelines, so they’re resorting
back to the old means of feeding the students.
Bring or Buy?:
So, should lunches be brought or bought? This depends if the
person is getting the nutrition and fullness they desire. For instance, it’s
better to bring for more food, nutrition and control over what is consumed.
However, this may not be the most cost effective means of lunch. The average
price of a school lunch ranges from free to $3.00 a day. It can be tough to
spend less than that if you’re bringing your own food.
Some lunches may not
look so good, but they do meet standards of the federal government. Whether you
prefer this or making your own lunch, it’s your decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.